GEM – Coin Design: Masterly Tool or False Representation?

Event poster

Coin Design: Masterly Tool or False Representation?

Presented by Mike Saxby

The Whitting Room (Arts 436), University of Birmingham

5:15 PM 11th February 2015

It can be argued that in simple form a disc of metal marked with a value, and possibly marked with its place of origin, can perform a basic function as money. If a design and inscription featuring the ruler are added, then a second function is added also: that of the invocation of the authority of the ruler. The idea that coins can provide publicity for a ruler can operate at several levels, as may be seen at least as early as Roman coins. Thus Mattingly suggested that Roman coins provided not simply publicity, but could be considered a form of propaganda. Subsequent discussion of the concept of propaganda on coins has been influenced by experience of propaganda in the twentieth century; such experience has tended to attach more negative connotations to the term ‘propaganda’ when applied to coin design. However Byzantine numismatists have been more willing to refer to ‘propaganda’ in coin design than have some other numismatists.

This presentation looks at examples of the invocation of imperial authority on Byzantine coins and also considers the caution of some numismatists in relation to propaganda.

Advertisements
GEM – Coin Design: Masterly Tool or False Representation?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s